- Things I like and dislike about The Good Doctor 2017 full movie
- The Good Doctor full movie: A medical drama from House experts
- How The Good Doctor Full Movie Finally Won Freddie Highmore a Golden Globe Nom
- The Good Doctor Full Movie Review: The show is new and exciting along with unique
- The Good Doctor full movie: finally, TV got autism right this time
With “Lord of the Rings The Two Towers,” it’s evident that director Peter Jackson has tilted the balance decisively against the hobbits and in favor of the traditional action figures of the Tolkien trilogy. The star is now clearly Aragorn (Viggo Mortensen), and the hobbits spend much of the movie away from the action. The last third of the film is dominated by an epic battle sequence that would undoubtedly startle the gentle medievalist J.R.R. Tolkien.
The task of the critic is to decide whether this shift damages the movie. It does not. “The Two Towers” is one of the most magnificent swashbucklers ever made, and, given current viewer tastes in violence, may well be more popular than the first entry, “The Fellowship of the Ring.” It is not faithful to the spirit of Tolkien and misplaces much of the charm and whimsy of the books, but it stands on its own as a visionary thriller. I complained in my review of the first movie that the hobbits had been short-changed, but with this second installment I must accept that as a given, and go on from there.
“The Two Towers” is a rousing adventure, a skillful marriage of special effects and computer animation, and it contains sequences of breathtaking beauty. It also brings us, in a character named the Gollum, one of the most captivating and convincing CGI beings I’ve ever seen. The Gollum was long in possession of the Ring, now entrusted to Frodo, and misses it (“my precious”) most painfully; however, the Gollum has a split personality and (in between spells when his dark side takes over) serves as a guide and companion for Frodo (played by Elijah Wood) and Sam (Sean Astin). His body language is a choreography of ingratiation and distortion.
The movie introduces another CGI character, Treebeard, a member of the oldest race in Middle-Earth, a tree that walks and talks and takes a very long time to make up its mind, explaining to Merry and Pippin that slowness is a virtue. I would have thought that a walking, talking tree would look weird and break the spell of the film, but no, there is a certain majesty in this mossy old creature.
The movie kicks off with a brief reprise of the grand battle between Gandalf (Ian McKellen) and Balrog, the monster made of fire and smoke, and is faithful to the ancient tradition of film serials by showing us that victory is snatched from certain death, as Gandalf banishes the creature and becomes in the process Gandalf the White.
To compress the labyrinthine story into a sentence or two, the enemy is Saruman (Christopher Lee), who commands a vast army of Uruk-Hai warriors against the fortress of Theoden (Bernard Hill). Aragorn joins bravely in the gang, but the real heroes are the computer effects, which build up the castle, landscape, armies and most of the action.
There are long stretches of “The Two Towers” in which we are looking at mostly animation on the screen. When Aragorn and his comrades throw an attack down a narrow fortress bridge, we figure that the shadows toppling to their doom are computer-generated, together with everything else on the screen, and yet the impact of the action is undeniable. Peter Jackson, like some of the brilliant silent directors, isn’t afraid to use his entire screen, to show images of wide scope and great complexity. He paints in the corners.
What one misses in the thrills of these epic splendors is much depth in the characters. All of the key figures are drawn with an attribute or two, and then defined by their actions. Frodo, the nominal hero, spends much of his time peering over and around things, watching others decide his fate, and occasionally gazing significantly upon the Ring.
Sam is his loyal sidekick on the sidelines. Merry and Pippin spend a climactic stretch of the film riding in Treebeard’s branches and staring goggle-eyed at everything, like kids carried on their father’s shoulders. The fellowship of the first movie has been divided into three during this one, and most of the action centers on Aragorn, who operates within the tradition of Viking swordsmen and medieval knights.
The details of the story–who is who, and why, and what their histories and attributes are–still remains somewhat murky to me. I know the general outlines and I boned up by rewatching the first film on DVD the night before seeing the second, and yet I am in awe of the true students of the Ring. For the amateur viewer, which is to say for most of us, the appeal of the movies is in the visuals. Here there be vast caverns and mighty towers, dwarves and elves and Orcs and the aforementioned Uruk-Hai (who look like distant cousins of the aliens in “Battlefield Earth”). And all are set within Jackson’s ambitious canvas and covered by magnificent New Zealand scenery.
“The Two Towers” will possibly be more popular than the first film, more of an audience-pleaser, but hasn’t Jackson lost the original purpose of the story somewhere along the way? He has taken a captivating and unique work of literature and retold the story in the terms of the modern action picture. If Tolkien had wanted to write about a race of supermen, he would have written a Middle-Earth version of “Conan the Barbarian.” But no. He told a story where modest little hobbits were the heroes. And now Jackson has steered the tale into the action mainstream. To do what he has done in this film must have been awesomely difficult, and he deserves applause, but to remain true to Tolkien would have been more difficult, and braver.