Atomic Blonde movie 2017– Weird on the Plot, But Smashing on the Action

As with so many stuffs, what you get from Atomic Blonde movie really relies on what you seek. You’ll find no satisfaction if you go in hoping for a good yarn, since the movie is a hash of single, double, and triple crosses, and the motives of the ultimate villain turn out to be incomprehensible. (The graphic novel on which the movie is based, The Coldest City, is no help.)

Nor — although Atomic Blonde film is lousy with spies and set in Berlin on the week that the wall falls — is there much in the way of a spooky-paranoid, John le Carré–like mood. The dialogue is snappy without any particular bite. The actors, with a couple of exceptions, are merely functional. But you don’t go to operas for dancing or ballets for singing, and you don’t see Atomic Blonde for anything but a badass female protagonist crunching bones and pulping faces in gratifyingly long takes or remarkable simulations thereof. The auteur here is literally the stunt man.

A stunt man, rather, who has punched and kicked and kung-fu’ed his way up the food chain. The name is David Leitch, and his directing work in Atomic Blonde full movie adds up to a stunt-person’s manifesto, which is also a reprimand to all those Marvel or DC films in which the camera is so close that you can’t see whose fist is placing on whose chin, the action is crushed into tiny bits, and the entire mess is run through a computer with the purpose of concealing the seams. (Partly this is because Western stars — being either too clumsy or too expensive to maim or kill, or both — must be protected in the editing room.) There is definitely editing (and computer enhancement) in Atomic Blonde, but Leitch has a love for full bodies at full extension, and whenever Charlize Theron’s spy Lorraine Broughton finds herself against the real or metaphorical wall, the camera pulls back to flash the entire playing area, and you can almost hear the director scream, “Ready … set … PUMMEL!”

The upshot is absolutely smashing. “Charlize Theron makes all other action heroes look like wimps!” screams a poster over Times Square, the quote courtesy of Rolling Stone in a blurb contrived to please equal-rights advocates, feminists, and maybe masochistic males. It does ignore the fact that Hong Kong action heroines have been kicking male butt for nearly half a century, that Uma Thurman was no slouch in the Kill Bill films, and that Gina Carano did all her own fighting in Haywire. But the latter movie is instructive: Director Steven Soderbergh took a point of letting Carano perform her mixed-martial-arts thing in long shots, but Soderbergh tends to ration himself to one huge idea each movie and then stick to it like a graduate student bent on proving a thesis — and so Carano’s action takes (impressive as they were) seemed like the day’s rushes before the editor could punch them up. In Atomic Blonde, the camera wasn’t placed at a nice distance. It swerves and hurtles and all but throws punches of its own. It’s an audience member and a participant.

Atomic Blonde movie 2017’s eyes-popping fight scene will be looked up for years to come. A faux single take that seems uncannily réal, it starts off with a visibly anxious Lorraine aiming her gun as she rides a rickety elevator, knowing that when the doors open she’ll have to start shooting — and punching, kicking, stabbing, etc. What follows is a series of whiplash moves that make us feel as if we’re in a giant pinball machine with ear-pummeling sound effects being bashed against one abutment after another while falling toward the abyss. Here is the best part of Theron’s performance: She doesn’t look as if her moves have been choreographed down to the smallest twitch. You see in her eyes the mark of a true hero: fear being elbowed aside by sheer determination not to die (or fail). It would have been fun to be in the room with Leitch and his crew when they viewed their finished scene and thought, “How could we have done that any better?” They couldn’t have — but they might have considered not making the rest of the movie so heavy and dull that we’re practically salivating for more people to get royally wasted.

For the sake of completeness, I should remind you that there is loads of plot but little in the way of clarity. Entertainment writers desperate for a hook have called Theron’s Broughton “a female Bond.” Yes, she is nominally a British secret agent who wears sleek outfits and beds a beautiful woman (a rival agent), but the original Bond characterization is rooted in class (and colonialist and sexual) privilege, as well as the sense that an entire nation’s super-technology is firmly in place behind a set of firm Establishment values. The world of Atomic Blonde is — at least until its coda — a nihilist’s vision of competing psychopaths, greed heads, and imperialists, and the heroine is mainly (by design) inscrutable. Noble values of a sort reassert themselves in the final moments but don’t do much to dispel the dour vibes. (The cynical ending of the graphic novel fits the material better but is almost equally stupid.)

Leitch and his French cinematographer Jonathan Sela try to achieve a distinctive look: washed-out Cold War exteriors with Theron’s white-blonde hair and shiny, thigh-high black boots supplying the glow. The soundtrack is ’80s Europop like “99 Luftballoons” along with a bit of Bowie and “Der Kommissar.” (A couple of times we hear the opening of Til Tuesday’s “Voices Carry” but I don’t recall the chorus ever coming.) As a CIA higher-up, John Goodman can be sour without losing his comic timing and James McAvoy can be murderous without losing his springy adorableness. Eddie Marsan has a few dear moments as the repository of the film’s McGuffin. But apart from Theron, the only actor who fully registers is Sofia Boutella as the French operative who fires Lorraine’s loins (and vice versa). Boutella is best known for her exotic aliens and/or killers in Kingsman: The Secret ServiceStar Trek Beyond, and The Mummy, and it’s nice to see that she doesn’t need bizarre makeup or limb-lopping appendages to make you want to watch her. But Atomic Blonde movie knocks aside that relationship with the same single-mindedness that makes the film, finally, so uninteresting.

The upbeating ’80s soundtrack (New Order, Depeche Mode, Ministry) couldn’t be any cooler, the ultraviolence is unceasingly brutal, and Theron’s guns-and-garters outfits are sexy as hell. So it’s a shame that apart from the gender flip, the plot is so derivative (really, a stolen microfilm?). Lickily, there’s one utterly bonkers stairway battle that goes on for so long it will leave you feeling breathless and aching. In the end, though, Atomic Blonde full movie is simply an exercise in style. But such style!

Watch Atomic Blonde full HD 720p movie: http://freemv.online/watch/atomic-blonde

Atomic Blonde movie 2017– Weird on the Plot, But Smashing on the Action
Rate this post

JOIN OUR NEWSLETTER
Join our newsletter now, you will receive new News everyday. Subscribe us now!
We hate spam. Your email address will not be sold or shared with anyone else.

COMMENTS

  • cassi

    Atomic Blonde movie story has brutal violence against innocent civilians is glamorised with pumping music, all in an attempt to make the bad guys seem as merciless as possible – I wonder why – to make us want bad things to happen to them. The dialogue is a joke too, with Theron uttering obscenities like (co!ksucker) in a dodgy English accent.

  • deangelokep

    Charlize Theron is great, but the rest of Atomic Blonde full movie is brutally bad

  • esmeral dapimente

    To be honest, Atomic Blonde is a risky move. It doesn’t have a long lasting franchise to protect or a worldwide fans to account for, and for that reason, if big box office is at stake, its libertine nature will become increasingly conversation about sex. I heard that Charlie Theron quite proud about her sex scene with Sofia Boutella to be some kinda move supporting LGBT, but in my opinion, LGBT is not only about same-gender sex but same-gender relationship.

  • trevorgo ertz

    I have to say that Atomic Blonde has an incomprehensive plot, but its action is absolutely smashing. If you’re looking for a good yarn, then, you will be disappointed when motives of the ultimate villain turn out to be incomprehensive.

  • adrien callejas

    I find that zero emotional stakes and the plot to be both difficult and pointlessly to follow. There’s an emptiness behind all the flash.

  • prestonsera

    Such a terrible screenplay and none of emotional content to be found. It was so fake that I feel it making fun of its own. I would have slept over if there weren’t some awesome fighting scenes

  • odelia east

    Why does a spy movie need emotion? Spies and assassins are supposed to be emotionless to get their job

  • yadi ranunes

    The low budget on this flick was rubbing in my face when I watched it. There are tons of boring scenes filled with uninteresting storyline. To be honest, you will forget the story even before the movie ends, and what’s left after watching it is sex and violence. So, if you’re looking for a movie with great story, don’t waste your time watching it.

  • nikolec levinger

    Like any other spy chick movies, this one is also based on original American Black Canary. For that matter, the movie shows Americans being misogynists and bureaucrats, and that is exactly opposite from the reality. Those misogynist and bureaucratic roles are filled by British without an original thought to their name. This is a movie of propaganda for its best.

  • jamesa

    It’s just a stupid empty film.

Leave a Comment

*